County record · Nebraska
Thomas County, Nebraska
- 1Hazardous-waste handlers
- 8Clean Air Act facilities
- 28Motor carriers
37 federal records are on file in Thomas County across 3 programs — the 84th largest of the 88 counties in Nebraska that carry records in more than one program. Each figure below is the count filed with the agency that collects it, and each links to that program’s own listing. County FIPS 31171.
Hazardous-waste handlers in Thomas County 1
Clean Air Act facilities in Thomas County 8
Motor carriers in Thomas County 28
Industries recorded in Thomas County 1
1 six-digit industries the Census counts in Thomas County, each beside the federal facility and compliance records filed there.
Other counties in Nebraska
The counties either side of this one in Nebraska's own alphabetical list.
- Saline County 394
- Sarpy County 1,864
- Saunders County 747
- Scotts Bluff County 678
- Seward County 445
- Sheridan County 99
- Sherman County 112
- Sioux County 13
- Stanton County 122
- Thayer County 248
- Thurston County 145
- Valley County 185
- Washington County 498
- Wayne County 194
- Webster County 124
- York County 489
All Nebraska counties → All Nebraska records →
Figures from the federal source files: EPA’s ECHO downloads, CMS provider files and the FMCSA census.
What this page shows
The entry for Thomas County, Nebraska, identified by the code 31171, presents a collection of federal facility and compliance records on file. These documents originate from specific federal programs that track environmental and transportation safety across the United States. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration holds 28 records for this jurisdiction, representing the bulk of the available data. The Environmental Protection Agency maintains 8 records related to air quality and facilities under its jurisdiction. Additionally, there is 1 record associated with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. These figures provide a concrete snapshot of the federal oversight present in the county. For individuals reviewing local regulatory history, these numbers offer a precise count of the specific interactions with federal agencies. The data allows for a clear understanding of which federal programs have documented activity in this area. This information serves as a factual baseline for those examining the intersection of local geography and federal regulatory archives.